Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parront
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:35, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Parront (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable neologism per WP:NEO, and WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. No significant coverage online in WP:Reliable sources. Proposed deletion contested by creator without comment. Uncle Roy (talk) 08:59, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Uncle Roy (talk) 09:07, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:03, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:03, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom Power~enwiki (talk) 19:10, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.