Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parodies featured on Arthur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete. W.marsh 17:50, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Parodies featured on Arthur

Cruft. Is it necessary to have an entire article just pointing out every parody in Arthur? DietLimeCola 16:24, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No. -- Kicking222 16:46, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is that a no to deletion, or a no to this article? DietLimeCola 18:02, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think he was answering your question :) . —Whomp ^(myedits) 19:09, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. —Whomp ^(myedits) 19:09, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As I have put a lot of research into this. RAM 00:30, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as list cruft, maybe merge it into an article particular to Arthur. Sorry, RAM, but "a lot of research" does not warrant an article as not list cruft. --Dennisthe2 00:46, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete as unsourced and likely original research. Kavadi carrier 01:47, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong request to stop crying If it makes you feel better I will merge this into the Athur TV show. And as far as DietLimeCola goes, virtually every TV show has this so called "cruft" you speak off. What seperated this from The Simpsons? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dkkicks (talk • contribs) November 6th 2006.
Comment Will you grow up? This is cruft, plain and simple. And if you move it to the main Arthur page, it'll still be cruft. Stop going crazy because an article that you like is nominated for AFD, and everyone is voting to delete it. DietLimeCola 07:24, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Quit the personal attacks. MatthewFenton (talk · contribs · count · email) 09:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Will I grow up? I'm not the jackass who was blocked for pretending to be an admin and thought he'd foil someone who was looking at a global warming page. You have absolutelty no business even nomanating stuff to be deleted. When you actually have some say on Wikipedia, get back to me.Dkkicks 14:35, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Are you joking? I apologized for that stuff a LONG time ago, its in the past, and everyone moved on. If you READ, even though it wasn't the right thing, I had a special reason why I did that to Global Warming. It's none of your buisness, I can nominate any article I want if it doesn't fit into Wikipedia, get over it. Save the drama for somewhere else, I'm done with this BS. DietLimeCola 16:41, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unencyclopedic minutae. Indrian 16:42, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - It's a good show and the page is well formated.. and it is sourced. MatthewFenton (talk · contribs · count · email) 09:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lacking sources. Thus, it's original research. Interrobamf 03:44, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep If you must delete it, delete everything in the "In popular culture" category. Matty-chan 03:26, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.