Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parker Core Knowledge Charter School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 02:29, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Parker Core Knowledge Charter School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

no assertion of notability Chris 01:59, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment My experience with "non-notable" schools is that they can all be proven notable to some degree. This one appears to lack notability. I will watch with interest. --Stormbay 02:44, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as it is written now. No notable alumni, no historical value, no architectural value claimed in thr article. Callelinea 03:20, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• N Speedy Delete no verification or proof of notability is present, or obtainable from a cursory Google search. The content is basically a placeholder without any distinguishing characteristics. VanTucky ^(talk) 03:28, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete agree with above. Tiggerjay 06:09, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as above, but probably not a speedy deletion candidate. Eusebeus 15:52, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 15:49, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 15:49, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete almost no information. (Schools are not subject to speedy deletion.) DGG (talk) 19:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per DGG. If a school can be summed up in a couple of sentences, then it probably isn't notable :) MetsFan76 21:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect to Parker, Colorado in an effort to stave off recreation and encourage development where it makes sense to do so. (jarbarf) 03:33, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.