Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Park Street Advisors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NW (Talk) 01:26, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Park Street Advisors (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing to suggest that this company meets the notability requirements. Stephen 03:30, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No notability; no sources other than company web pages. PhGustaf (talk) 03:38, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Pure unadulterated WP:SPAM. I'm surprised they didn't include a PayPal link. Qworty (talk) 06:25, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete (again) and salt/ I've tagged for speedy as repost -- sorry, I don't know how to find the old deletion discussions, but this is at least the 2nd if not 3rd time it's been posted and deleted. 12:08, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

  My mistake. "Speedy repost" is for articles previously deleted per deletion discussion, not per speedy. I guess we need a deletion discussion (i.e. right here) to get this salted. So I've removed the speedy tag. EEng (talk) 12:24, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and salt after this creates the public precedent we need to speedily delete any attempt at recreating this. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:33, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:40, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and salt as above. Wikipedia is not a venue for advertising. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:45, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and salt per above. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 16:24, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Not notable enough for an WP article.--Bobbyd2011 (talk) 12:08, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I've seen purer spam, but this has 'written by' through and through, just like a stick of rock. No references given, just company links. If this has previously been repeatedly created, salt as well. Peridon (talk) 14:15, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.