Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parimal Trivedi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nominator withdrew the nomination. (non-admin closure) Lourdes 03:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Parimal Trivedi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACADEMIC and WP:ANYBIO EvergreenFir (talk) 18:07, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 18:13, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 18:13, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as the only claim of notability should be deleted per WP:BLPCRIME. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 23:41, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep as he was the Vice-Chanceller (the highest post) of Gujarat University, one of the major universities of Gujarat state of India. He received coverage mostly in local Gujarati language so limited English sources are available. Apart from controversies around him, we should check his academic profile and contribution. I agree that two line article is not helpful but hope that there would be enough refs to make it atleast start-class.--Nizil (talk) 05:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as a clear pass of WP:PROF criterion 6. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 16:00, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see no evidence of "The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society". Vice-Chancellor is not the highest-level. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:27, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'll be damned. It is the highest (governor is the ex-officio chancellor). I guess I'll withdraw my nomination. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:29, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.