Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paragon prepatory middle school
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete as a hoax. --Coredesat 05:21, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Utter nonsense. Was PRODded, the prod removed. Affiliated with the Church of Satan and Marilyn Manson, huh? Created and de-PRODded by an editor with a history of vandalism. User:Zoe|(talk) 17:11, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Just about 1180 Ghits cannot be notable.--Jusjih 17:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- 1180 hits? What search are you using? User:Zoe|(talk) 17:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete - 2nd place in tetherball? excellence in basket weaving? obviously a joke. delete. JoeSmack Talk(p-review!) 17:41, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Pure silliness. - Corporal Tunnel 17:56, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete appears to be a hoax article. (attack comment removed) —ptk✰fgs 18:17, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Real school, hoax article. DCEdwards1966 20:35, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per DCEDwards. Given the joke content and misspelled and miscapitalized name, there's no good reason to keep this in the edit history. --Metropolitan90 23:32, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete please it is a attack article no reason to keep it in history Yuckfoo 01:38, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, obvious vandalism. Unclear why this is at AFD. Christopher Parham (talk) 17:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I've removed most of the general vandalism and nonsense, however, I can't confirm most of the details remaining. I'm also a bit puzzled as to why the school has a .com and not a .edu address. In any event, it fails to meet WP:V since I can't find significant non-trivial sources even before we get to the failing WP:N problem. JoshuaZ 20:40, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Why haven't we figured out a speedy delete criterion for non-notable hoaxes yet? Silensor 06:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.