Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pantaron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pantaron Mountain Range. Not sure why this wasn't closed sooner!, As always see no point dragging an AFD on just for the pure hell of it so redirect it shall be. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 22:11, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pantaron

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. I dream of horses (T) @ 00:42, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Pantaron Mountain Range, which is certainly notable and verifiable. The website discussed in the article doesn't seem to be notable. Everymorning talk 00:53, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the mountain range and get rid of the possible spam. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:10, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per above: original research, not encyclopedic content. There's an unsourced dictionary definition (it may be original research or speculation), a mention of the mountain range which already has its own article, and a mention of website pantaron.com which doesn't appear notable. Colapeninsula (talk) 09:52, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above, content is unsourced OR. Nwlaw63 (talk) 15:11, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, yep obvious and is a very plausible search term. Crow^Caw 21:52, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.