Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pals for Life

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigma^msg 23:39, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pals for Life

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a procedural nomination for this page due to its apparent non-notability based on the hour-long conversation on IRC with the page creator arguing with DragonflySixtyseven about getting the related image deleted. From the edit history it looks like various parties have been attempting (and failing) to nominate the page properly, so I'm being nice and doing it for them. I have no opinions on the page, and have not done any BEFORE. Primefac (talk) 20:41, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:46, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:46, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - None of the news Google pulls up is about the films. Instead they either use the phrasing, are about various charities, or a World of Warcraft guild that counts the infamous Leeroy Jenkins among its number and discussing the staged nature of that video. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 20:06, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with regrets, as this seems to be a worthy creative work that should get more attention than it has received. I also found similar sources, and when adding "World War I" to the search query in news and newspapers I would get only one irrelevant result. If anyone else can find a couple of valid sources beyond the blog already cited in the article, I will heartily change my vote. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:07, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Google News does not find any significant coverage of the film, so it fails WP:NFILM. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:21, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Author asked for the article to be delete as they created it for marketing reasons. Also fails WP:NFILM. Snowycats (talk) 18:37, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as immediately above. Bondegezou (talk) 22:10, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.