Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palmerston Primary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  19:48, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

there is concensus that high schools can have a WP article but we should not open the door for primary schools BlueValour 16:18, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Nothing very special about the school, even after looking at its website. Kimchi.sg 17:34, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non notable school. --Eivind^t@c 22:42, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Palmerston, Australian Capital Territory. This school was the first to open in the Gungahlin District in the ACT. However, most of the verifiable articles in an Australia New Zealand database related to a similar named school in the Northern Territory. It would therefore remain a stub and would be best within the article on the suburb itself. Capitalistroadster 01:44, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 01:50, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable. --Roisterer 14:49, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge as per Capitalistroadster. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 14:55, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Keep and continue to expand. Silensor 16:54, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep all schools are notable see Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments#Keep.  ALKIVAR™ 17:53, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Alkivar. --Myles Long 18:02, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Needs expansion, not deletion. -- Usgnus 20:50, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• keep please it will expand this is a wiki Yuckfoo 22:12, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• keep -- organisations that are permament, and involving significant numbers of people are notable. The article needs a bit of expansion though. GB 23:02, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Lots of other primary schools have been kept, and this one should be kept as well. Once that is established this nonsense can finally end. CalJW 05:19, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge as per Capitalistroadster and is standard practice with other Canberra schools. Allow section to develop within suburb article. When (and if) substantial content, then can be broken out into own article.--A Y Arktos\^talk 10:13, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Notable. Golfcam 17:44, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, most schools are notable. bbx 06:50, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Strong precedent to include schools. Can be verified and is a subject of great importance.--Auger Martel 12:09, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.