Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palapala

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that individual is not notable (or, at least, they aren't reliably in that position, which hinders showing notability) Nosebagbear (talk) 21:43, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palapala (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Existence is only believed by a single scholar. Very poorly sourced with two sources, one of which confirms the belief that the individual did not exist. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   15:02, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and India.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   15:02, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I think that he is only descendant of ruler of Pala Empire but he doesn't rule the empire. You can see this list of ruler of the empire https://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/list-of-pala-rulers-and-their-contributions-1509103479-1 (Note - This list is made by Jagran Josh)Contributor008 (talk) 07:45, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.