Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palace Proclamation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was closed as moot. I have moved this content to User:Marlo0921/Palace Proclamation. Content was apparently a synopsis of an original story by that editor. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:05, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Palace Proclamation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sorry to bring this here, but prod declined and no real speedy category applies. Someone has posted an outline of their story, which they appear to claim is a novel, although there's no sign of any story beyond this outline. This doesn't require a week of discussion, suggest speedy userfy. Hairhorn (talk) 13:52, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Concur with userifying this, though asking at the author's talk page if this would be acceptable could have been tried before coming to AfD. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 14:05, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose. He's already removed a speedy tag and ignored a prod tag, I didn't see the point of stacking more on when I can't userfy anyhow. Hairhorn (talk) 14:40, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was the editor that PRODed the article, agree speedy userfy looks to be the best course of action.--blue520 14:53, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.