Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistani cricket team in India in 1979-80
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete. Tyrenius 01:47, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Pakistani cricket team in India in 1979-80
- Pakistani cricket team in India in 1979-80 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Worst.Article.Ever. Seriously, could it be any more uninformative? I don't mind stubs, but hate empty stubs that just serve to fill up a red link. Consider this a blanket nomination for any other article created by User:BlackJack that simply restates the title. I'm not up to searching for all of them, so could someone give me a hand in listing them? Also, I am against a merge/redirect, as the article is too specific, and having bluelinks would confuse people into thinking these articles exist, who would probably give up finding the real articles after their first clicks are redirects. SeizureDog 09:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I also suggest mass nominating most of the articles in Template:International cricket tours of India. Other than a few exceptions, all of them consist of 1 sentence each (re-stating the title, The (country A) toured India in (year b)). TJ Spyke 09:52, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - CSD:A1 and tagged as such. Most of the 1 liners are a rephrasing of the title and external links only, and are therefore A1s, and should be speedied rather than going through a time-intensive AfD. TerriersFan 01:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.