Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paisley Pipe Band
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR Mark Arsten (talk) 02:24, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Paisley Pipe Band
- Paisley Pipe Band (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another non-notable band. Jamesx12345 17:42, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 18:17, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:14, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 05:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable, having won a world championship and attracted some press coverage. Warden (talk) 14:16, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Winning novice juvenile is not especially prestigious - the big one for under-18 bands is the juvenile grade. Pipe bands typically get a lot of routine coverage from playing at parades and such - my pipe band, definitely not notable, also has similar coverage. George Watson's College Pipes and Drums is a massively more successful band in the juvenile grade, but still wasn't regarded as notable at AFD. Jamesx12345 14:43, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 18:57, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.