Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OxySure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A Train^talk 12:02, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OxySure

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional article of a non-notable company that doesn't appear to pass GNG. Google and Google News check brings up a bit of WP:ROUTINE coverage, mostly revolving around its stock price, which is currently three-tenths of one U.S. penny. There are also a few stories about a 2015 FDA recall of one of its products. The article has references, but they are mostly press releases or from the company's own website:
1, 4, 9, and 14 are from the company's website.
2, 8, 10, 11, 12, and 13 are all press releases.
3 is a page at the New York Times' website which states "News about OxySure Systems Inc., including commentary and archival articles published in The New York Times." and then proceeds to list no articles.
5 is about the FDA recall.
6 is a transcript of an earnings call from the company CEO.
7 is a routine product announcement.
Egsan Bacon (talk) 10:42, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 10:53, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 10:53, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 10:53, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 10:54, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- promotional 'cruft on a nn business. Sourcing here fails WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:04, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Corporate spam, no indications of notability, fails WP:SPIP and GNG. References are all PRIMARY sources and fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:24, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.