Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overview of The Windsor Lines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedily deleted by User:Anthony Bradbury as A10 Fences&Windows 23:50, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Overview of The Windsor Lines

Overview of The Windsor Lines (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

At first thought this was an established article however something just didn't feel right. This article is essentially a mass of copied content from other articles; namely Waterloo to Reading Line; Chertsey branch line; Hounslow Loop Line; Staines–Windsor line and probably countless others. Poorly sourced, essentially WP:CFORKing of various pages; each individual line's page is more than enough; we don't particularly need this in Wikipedia. Nightfury 08:34, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Nightfury 08:34, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Nightfury 08:34, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per the failure to mention 5K76 working cars to Clapham Yard on the Windsor Reversable, Friday nights, blocking 9O58 WP:CFORK; nothing to merge and a redirect would not be helpful in this case. ——Serial 08:44, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Serial Number 54129, Thanks for making my day! XD Nightfury 09:13, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Creator's talk page is a mess of warnings, especially about copy/pasting content into articles. This is just a further such an example. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:59, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Filer's comment: Creator of the article has been blocked for a month. Nightfury 09:23, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This page of duplicate information is not needed, and it includes this user's shoddy English and weird capitalisation. --David Biddulph (talk) 09:26, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as an unnecessary content fork. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:34, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.