Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outline of cricket

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 13:03, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Outline of cricket

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete or redirect to Cricket. This is apparently trying to be a summarised version of Cricket but it is hopelessly incomplete and will realistically remain so. A waste of space. Jack | ^{talk page} 14:03, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge With Cricket JohnTombs48 (talk) 14:17, 30 October 2016 (UTC) per WP:SOCKSTRIKE[reply]
Delete as redundant JMWt (talk) 16:06, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:08, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As the base Cricket article is well-developed, I am unsure what value merge would provide, but perhaps an editor could select some portions.--Rpclod (talk) 18:06, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, redundant. I don't think there's any information worth merging to the main article. IgnorantArmies (talk) 07:06, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a poor copy of the main Cricket article Spike 'em (talk) 09:17, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to cricket - with the scope to recreate if the cricket article ever gets brought up to scratch. Blue Square Thing (talk) 21:09, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.