Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outline of Roget's Thesaurus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:56, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Outline of Roget's Thesaurus

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an outline of a reference work rather than an encyclopedia article on a notable topic. It does not cite any sources. Moving to the WP namespace is a possible alternative to deletion, but I don't really see the purpose of this page. Rublov (talk) 17:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:41, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:42, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:42, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Obvious WP:NOTDIR, not an outline article. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 21:23, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unsure The utility of a thesaurus outline is something I hadn't considered before. If this had been one person's work I would opt to userify it for them, but the source of this appears to be public domain, enhanced over the last ~19 years for Wikipedia utility purposes. If this were a vanity outline of any dissimilar work, it would be clearly deletable, but I am uncertain whether this might be of use. Jclemens (talk) 21:33, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like it gets an average of about 16 pageviews per day, so... not a lot of use? -- asilvering (talk) 00:35, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per WP:NOTIINFO. An almost endless list with very little context and usefulness. Ajf773 (talk) 09:34, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing to see here. Nwhyte (talk) 01:19, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.