Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oscar De la Rosa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:12, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oscar De la Rosa

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claim of notability. Only political office is city councilman. MB 01:40, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. MB 01:40, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. MB 01:40, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NPOL by a lot. Unlike the recent Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Koski, there is not a suitable place to redirect this to as Hialeah City Council does not have its own article. snood1205^{(Say Hi! (talk))} 03:23, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Coming back to add that would maybe ~~be best~~ work as a redirect to Oscar De La Rosa, but that's completely unrelated to him and to be honest it might be better to have the article deleted and then create from fresh as a redirect to not have an incredibly confusing history. snood1205^{(Say Hi! (talk))} 03:26, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Even if this article were kept, one of the two really would need to be moved. Capitalization would not be enough of a detail here to permit different titled articles. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 04:36, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly. If this article is kept then it should be at Oscar De la Rosa (politician) and maybe keep Oscar De La Rosa where he is or move to Oscar De La Rosa (musician). It's arguable whether or not the musician Oscar is WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. snood1205^{(Say Hi! (talk))} 18:36, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 02:27, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. City council is not a level of office that gets an automatic notability pass under WP:NPOL — the notability test for a city councillor is not "he exists", but "he has a strong and reliably sourced reason to be considered markedly more notable than most other city councillors". But this doesn't even attempt to articulate any reason whatsoever why his city council career should be seen as a special case, and the article is referenced entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability at all. Bearcat (talk) 16:14, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Bearcat. City council is not notable and it seems the article was created after winning the relevant election in November. – The Grid (talk) 02:29, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.