Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orthodoxy Cognate PAGE Society

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:58, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orthodoxy Cognate PAGE Society

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't actually find any real, independent, reliable sources that discuss this organization in a meaningful way. The article is a COI/sock nightmare from the get-go, and you can go back through the history if you think I cut too much--but you won't find the kind of sourcing that proves notability per WP:CORP. Drmies (talk) 00:35, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:36, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:36, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:43, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:06, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - zero evidence of notability Spiderone 12:26, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article does not satisfy WP:ORGCRIT and exists only because the organisation itself created it. If there is real notability, let someone without a COI write a new article. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 19:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete fails WP:GNG. --Fish and karete (talk) 17:47, 1 August 2020 (UTC) Striking sock !vote[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.