Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operator (2015 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no delete proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 21:53, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Operator (2015 film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film, no significant coverage by independent sources, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 22:14, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:31, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:NFSOURCES; the film has been mentioned by Refinery 29, Deadline Hollywood and Patch Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 22:39, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've added a review from Radio Times to further add to its notability. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 22:48, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've added more sources that mention the film from The Post and Courier and Manila Standard. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 23:19, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment While these sources are good sources, they don't all constitute significant coverage. The Post and Courier article refers to the film in a single sentence as part of a list of film appearances and The Radio Times review is a capsule review (short summary of plot and a star rating, no actual review of the film). The others are more significant, talking about Casting or an actual critical review (and I am not sure how I missed these either...) BOVINEBOY2008 15:08, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've added a significant link from Jezebel and removed the links from Post and Courier and Radio Times. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 10:53, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Bovineboy2008: I've added a significant source from Screen Daily that mentions this film. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 15:55, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks for finding that! I think all of this is enough to withdraw my concerns for this AfD. BOVINEBOY2008 15:58, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.