Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Online reality games

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Marasmusine (talk) 09:28, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Online reality games

Unreferenced. Failed to establish notability. Just a growing stream of advertisements for game websites. Spam. Recommend this is deleted. Maybe add a brief mention in Reality television or Online games. Anitpatel (talk) 21:29, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and possibly merge some worthwhile content to Online game. Black Kite 22:37, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
keep Needs rewriting for literacy, but appears to have real encyclopedic content. The list is a small part of the article. DGG (talk) 02:59, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

keep It has some actual info and there is no reason for it to be deleted.It should remain as is.
Delete I see no references, reliable or otherwise. // Chris ^{(complaints)•(contribs)} 06:00, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless rewritten and properly referenced by closing time. Without refs we can't assess notability. How would we even begin to check all this stuff? The whole thing could be nonsense for all I know. --DanielRigal (talk) 19:01, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - for all I know this could be a complete hoax or complete OR. There are NO references. Anybody who wants to keep this article should provide verifiable refs to reliable sources. Sbowers3 (talk) 21:13, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete based upon some google searches, I have reason to believe that these games do exist, but I found no coverage of them in anything that could be remotely dubbed a reliable source. --Asmodeus Samael (talk) 00:23, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Forgive me if my reasoning smacks of WP:WAX, but these seem to have have the same notability level as E-Wrestling feds. Perhaps there is enough for a stubbified version of the article, but I doubt it. -- RoninBK _{T C} 00:19, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.