Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Online portfolio

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Electronic portfolio. The Bushranger One ping only 01:00, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Online portfolio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I PRODded this earlier but the PROD tag was removed by someone giving a reason (WP:RS found) that was unrelated to the reasons I'd given for deletion. My reasons: Basically a dictionary definition, a trivial one (an online portfolio is a portfolio that's online), followed by what reads like a personal appeal for why the reader would want one ("it is nowadays essential", "profit from the conveniences"). Others have removed the link to a specific portfolio site that had originally been given, but it still reads like an exhortation rather than a beyond-dictionary reference article. —Largo Plazo (talk) 15:37, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Good catch. I will tweak my !vote accordingly.--cyclopiaspeak! 15:49, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.