Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oneword.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Appears to fail general notability guidelines at this time due to trivial mentions in sources. Perhaps in the future! SarahStierch (talk) 01:38, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oneword.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tiny website. Only coverage cited, while not too trivial, is incidental. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 03:55, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The one source would probably keep it from being speedied, even though the link itself doesn't actually link to anything anymore. I can't find any reliable coverage for this website, not even the purported Yahoo link. This just isn't a notable website. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:20, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep While not hugely notable I did find coverage of the website in a news source and several books, all of which look to be reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 23:41, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indifferent I'm the creator of oneword.com, and have officially trademarked the term "oneword," So I'm fine if the ".com" is removed from the title, revising it to "oneword" with a simple one-line description, such as, "oneword is a simple writing prompt created in 2002. It gives users one word per day and sixty seconds to write about it." All the other stuff is superfluous. Or delete it. I'm indifferent as to whether or not there is a Wikipedia page. Thanks. Invisibleland (talk) 23:11, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.