Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Shot (JLS song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jayjg ^(talk) 04:21, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One Shot (JLS song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to violate; WP:NSONGS, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:GNG, WP:RS. WossOccurring (talk) 18:06, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL --Shirik (talk) 18:12, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 21:57, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete. Looks like it could go under A9. smithers - talk - sign! 23:22, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. The coverage I'm finding essentially amounts to "'One Shot' is the next single, due out in February." Per WP:NSONGS, "A separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article." There's not enough "detail" at this point, though that could very well change once it's released.  Gongshow ^Talk 23:30, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete While this does not qualify as an A9 (the band does have an article), I still don't think we need an article on the song until it has been released and received significant coverage. TNXMan 00:28, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.