Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OneTravel (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:33, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OneTravel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private business. Significant RS coverage not found. Article is cited to passing mentions, routine news, WP:SPIP, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Created by an account currently indef blocked for undisclosed paid editing; pls see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Draykyle. The first AfD closed as "Delete" in 2011. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:19, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 05:36, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 05:36, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The articles provided as references are about this brand's parent company Fareportal (both articles' Infoboxes also claim approx. the same number of employees) and about another of their brands. Nothing provided or found to indicate that this subject is of encyclopaedic notability, by WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:NWEB, WP:GNG. No reason to overturn the previous AfD consensus. AllyD (talk) 08:59, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indications of notability, references fail the criteria for establishing notability and fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:55, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lack of in-depth coverage found; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. gongshow talk 16:35, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.