Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OneTen
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 21:29, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OneTen
- OneTen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A building which, if built, which it won't be, would have been on the List of tallest buildings in Providence, but it isn't even mentioned there. Nothing on Google books or scholar and not the seems to be significant news reporting on the building. The domain name for the project is now up for sale. Sic transit gloria mundi. A passing mention in the list article might be justified, in which case a redirect would be all that's needed (although the current name is undoubtedly going to be ambiguous sooner or later). Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:50, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:09, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The only reference given is to an article which briefly mentions that at the time the article was written (September 27, 2007) the project was being scaled back, and would not be built as originally planned. Scarcely substantial coverage. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:14, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.