Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On The Line (Michael Jackson Song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:17, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On The Line (Michael Jackson Song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

On The Line (Michael Jackson Song)

Song article that has no references, and so neither establishes musical notability nor is verifiable. Created twice in article space. Already moved to draft space once, and re-created in article space with no references, so that requesting deletion of the article is the only choice left. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:46, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:46, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - complete failure of WP:NSONGS. Probably not even worth a redirect with a title like that (with capitalization errors to boot.) Sergecross73 msg me 16:44, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Already a redirect at On the Line (Michael Jackson song) and some information at target. --Richhoncho (talk) 20:18, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect (as nominator) to the same target as On the Line (Michael Jackson song), Michael Jackson's Ghosts#On the Line. Incorrect capitalization is redirected to the correct version. Since the correct version is itself a redirect, a single redirect and not a double redirect should be used. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:30, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Not sure there is any value in keeping a one day old miscapitalisation. Richhoncho (talk) 09:18, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  My thoughts exactly. Sergecross73 msg me 19:44, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: No indication of notability, and there's already a similar redirect. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 12:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete as duplicate redirect. SBKSPP (talk) 01:00, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete due to the article being a duplicate redirect. TH1980 (talk) 02:48, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.