Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omni Tech Translations and Language Services

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 11:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Omni Tech Translations and Language Services

Omni Tech Translations and Language Services (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:ORGCRIT, written like an advertisement. No reliable sources and a cursory Google does not provide anything of note. In addition, when this was created it was very quickly put up for speedy deletion, and the SD tag was removed soon after by the user who created the article. Very sus. pinktoebeans (talk) 20:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. pinktoebeans (talk) 20:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. pinktoebeans (talk) 20:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. pinktoebeans (talk) 20:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. pinktoebeans (talk) 21:07, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete References on the article do not meet WP:ORGCRIT my google did not find anything else to add. Jeepday (talk) 18:30, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: An article describing a company going about its business, its prior management buy-out,etc., but not indicating what would be its notability here. Searches find routine listings but nothing better. AllyD (talk) 08:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.