Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis and Administration (2nd nomination)
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn. I disagree about this being notable, but the consensus will definitely end up being keep because they think that it is inherently notable. Joe Chill (talk) 22:45, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis and Administration
AfDs for this article:
- Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis and Administration (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this company organization. Joe Chill (talk) 02:30, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It doesn't look like its a company Joe, maybe a government organization which is my expertise, let me look around and see what there is to work with. -Marcusmax(speak) 02:46, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Did you see this? -Marcusmax(speak) 02:49, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It's part of US DOT and has regulatory authority, a good bit of regulations accessible through Gnews. -SpacemanSpiff 06:31, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: As part of the USDOT and STB, its certainly notable, but if it doesn't merit its own page, it should be merged into the existing subsection at Surface Transportation Board and redirected there.--Milowent (talk) 14:09, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. No coherent rationale for deletion, extensive coverage, consequential government agency, plausible search term. Needs a rewrite, since it's minimally paraphrased from the official site, but since that's not a copyvio, it isn't a deletion issue. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:08, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.