Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odin Brewing Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:08, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Odin Brewing Company

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Organization is not notable. There is no significant coverage. refer to WP:CORP, WP:GNG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pbjordahl (talk • contribs) 23:07, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The nomination seems half-baked, having been created by a single-purpose account. The topic is notable, being covered in sources such as Brewing in Seattle; Washington Beer: A Heady History of Evergreen State Brewing; Beer Lover's Washington. Andrew D. (talk) 10:12, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ coverage in trade magazines may not signify notability https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)/Archive_14#Trade_journals_and_trade_publications. Requests from new contributors to wikipedia does not invalidate their activity or comments per se. Request feedback from other contributors on this matter of notability and confirmation from any editors that there no conflict of interest. Conflict of interest — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pbjordahl (talk • contribs) 7:32, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

This !vote is from the nominator contrary to WP:DISCUSSAFD, "Nomination already implies that the nominator recommends deletion (unless indicated otherwise), and nominators should refrain from repeating this recommendation on a separate bulleted line." Andrew D. (talk) 18:38, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Struck duplicate !vote from nominator; the nomination is considered as your !vote. However, feel free to comment all you'd like. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:24, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Whatever technical problems that might exist with the nomination, the nominator's addendum that coverage in trade magazines alone might not suffice is helpful. The brief mentions in The Stranger (newspaper), The Seattle P-I and The Tukwila Reporter are WP:ROUTINE blurbs written in the time honored form "press release -> lazy reporter -> filler". Significant coverage is usually the result of a reporter doing actual reporting work, leaving their desk, going outside, gathering information, interviewing people. The subject itself is run of the mill: a guy opens a small business in 2009, makes widgets, buys another small widget maker, moves to larger facility. Several hundred thousand other small businesses did the same thing in 2009. Odin Brewing seems nice and all but, it's not an encyclopedic topic. I would change my mind and support keeping this article if in-depth coverage existed in a reliable publication, or if at least we could establish that Odin Brewing is unique or special in some way that has had a noticable effect or influence. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 15:18, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG, references rely almost exclusively on company produced material or quotations from company officers and therefore fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 12:59, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Discussion page was created without the {{afd2}} template and never transcluded to a daily log. Fixed now--I have no opinion on the nomination itself at this time. --Finngall ^talk 13:58, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 14:40, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 14:40, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:46, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH.--SamHolt6 (talk) 21:55, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
weak Delete very few broad articles to meet GNG. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:05, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.