Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OK! Records
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 02:19, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK! Records
- OK! Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sign of notability. Article appears to have been mainly edited by the founder (User:Ollie K1986) and by Greg Dowell, an artist on the record label. I've looked for sources but can't find any to add.
Note this AfD for Greg Dowell: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Dowell Smartse (talk) 15:41, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete There are obvious COI and self-promotion issues. No third-party sources that aren't mirrors of OK!'s info. No evidence of notability. Delete this, along with their most "notable" artist, Greg Dowell. Angryapathy (talk) 16:52, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this record label. Joe Chill (talk) 20:30, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete COI and self promotion are not valid reasons for deletion in themselves. But the label does not even approach satisfying the notability criteria. I could find no reviews or other independent media coverage for this label. None of its artists are notable either. See my comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Dowell, who appears to be their most 'notable' artist. Voceditenore (talk) 23:02, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.