Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O.C. Dawgs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:26, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

O.C. Dawgs

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A WP:BEFORE search doesn't turn up anything not already in the article, which would suggest the topic is not notable and does not meet WP:BAND. ––FormalDude talk 04:45, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:07, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:07, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep:Perhaps the reason why there is little new information added is because the one who created this page did a good job researching on the topic. And while it is questionable for the first criteria of WP:BAND, it does meet other criteria such as #2 (they were on Billboard Philippines Top 20), #8 (Wish Music Awards), #11 and #12.D-Flo27 (talk) 03:16, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The current sources do not pass GNG. There also aren't any sources to verify your claim of them making the Billboard top 20, nor any radio sources suggesting they meet criteria #11 or #12. ––FormalDude talk 07:11, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just added sources of them on Billboard Top 20 in the article, so that takes care of #2. For #11 and #12, they were on the "Wish Bus" segment of Wish 107.5, which is the most popular segment of one of the more popular radio stations in the country, and that song must have been constantly replayed on their radio as well. Lastly, they are still making music, so as they become more popular like they were before, I think better sources will come.D-Flo27 (talk) 11:28, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep per the now-sourced charting claim. I note that one potential obstacle in finding coverage is that they appear to be inconsistently credited as "OC Dawgs" as well as "O.C. Dawgs". _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:13, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:MUSICBIO per above arguments. SBKSPP (talk) 01:32, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.