Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nutrilayer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singu larity 00:01, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nutrilayer

User Mlamb1 (talk · contribs) has put in a series of articles about products of the Eastman Chemical Company. A speedy on this one was declined as a borderline case, with the suggestion of taking it to AFD "if article still appears as advertising". There are are clear COI issues - this user's only edits are to Eastman Chemical and its products - and the only references are the company's website and an external link which is a story written by "Nancy E. Kinkade Ph.D. – Eastman Chemical Company". Although the article reads like a product catalogue entry rather than a blatant advertisement, it is still promotion - out to explain the product's advantages.

I suggest that we Delete this and the four similar articles I have listed below, because they do not demonstrate notability for these products, and we should not let Wikipedia become an Eastman Chemical product catalogue. JohnCD (talk) 21:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. I originally nomd this for speedy and was surprised it was declined. To my mind clearly spam. – ukexpat (talk) 21:27, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all as non-notable product spam. /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 03:02, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. Delete all as non-notable and spam. Dawn bard (talk) 14:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:SPAM. --Shark face 217 02:59, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.