Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nupedia Open Content License

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Transwiki and redirect. I've got an account on Wikisource, so I've moved the text of the license over there. I have also redirected the page. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 18:36, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nupedia Open Content License (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Lack of content, mostly just a copy of the full text version of the license. Notability concerns have been given, and I agree that it's not of major interest of the world. _→AzaToth 22:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Transwiki to WikiSource, if its not already there. 132.205.44.5 (talk) 22:38, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Transwiki as above. Fulltext documents like this are not really suitable for an encyclopædia. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 00:05, 1 March 2008 (UTC).[reply]
• Transwiki as above and redirect to Nupedia. --Merovingian (T, C) 15:39, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:32, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleteor transwiki...fails WP:NOT--Sallicio^{${\displaystyle \color {Red}\oplus }$} 09:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.