Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nulloy

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:07, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nulloy

Nulloy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any coverage from a reliable source about this software, so I think it fails WP: N. HyperAccelerated (talk) 18:38, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been edited quite a lot since the nomination. What did you think of the additions, Youknowwhoistheman? Liz Read! Talk! 08:19, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think so. Thanks, you with warm Regards! Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 11:24, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I don’t think any of the sources that have been added thus far establish notability, because there is no way to establish the reliability of the sources. HyperAccelerated (talk) 18:27, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.