Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuestra Belleza México 2015

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 00:45, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nuestra Belleza México 2015 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unsourced local pageant, crystal ball The Banner talk 08:01, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Then you're going to have to delete the other 21 Nuestra Belleza México pageant articles we have here. Mexico's Miss USA equivalent, and even more notable this year thanks to a certain US candidate's views on the country's people that had Televisa pull this pageant's winner out of Miss Universe competition. As usual with longtime yearly events, unless an asteroid falls somewhere in Quintana Roo, this is undoubtedly taking place. Nate • (chatter) 08:11, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • No need to start jumping up and down. I can be convinced by reliable sources (conform WP:RS) in the article... The Banner talk 18:31, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:16, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 01:16, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Per above and [1]. Glad we had that chat about WP:BEFORE. Vrac (talk) 00:25, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • LOL, so you have seen the effectively 66 hits on Google and 27 hits on Google News for a search on "Nuestra Belleza México 2015". The Banner talk 10:02, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LOL Notability is not determined by Google hit counts. Vrac (talk) 22:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But they are a strong indicator... The Banner talk 22:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, they are not. Hits do not reveal depth of coverage. And we do not delete things based on indications one way or the other. Vrac (talk) 13:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.