Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nu gaze
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jenks24 (talk) 19:48, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Nu gaze (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article was nominated for deletion ([1]) by 121.222.124.249 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) for the following reason "I've nominated this page for deletion as there is no distinction between what this article covers and the shoegaze article." Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 11:26, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article has previously been nominated for deletion - the result was keep - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nu Gaze. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 11:35, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 11:36, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep seems to be a recognized genre. If the distinction between nu-gaze and shoe gazing needs to be sharpened up, sharpen it, don't nom for deletion. Rich Farmbrough, 00:44, 25 July 2012 (UTC).[reply]
- Keep per User:Rich Farmbrough, that was my opinion when I created the deletion page (etc) for User:121.222.124.249 but I was waiting for a comment by someone else before I weighed in.
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:13, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.