Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nouveau geek
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 21:37, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Nouveau geek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is not a dictionary. This is just a dictionary entry Fire 55 (talk) 04:07, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, instances of the term I found on the Internet, which is a series of tubes, do not entirely match the unsourced claims in the article. At best, this article could be documenting a neologism, but this is more likely a protologism. Abductive (reasoning) 04:24, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete looks like a neologism. Jujutacular talkcontribs 00:22, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.