Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NotePub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:00, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NotePub

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After a cursory search, NotePub seems to have had a couple of reviews in 2009, but nothing bigger than GigaOM. I couldn't find any other mainstream source.

I feel the article lacks in notability (and has few chances to gain traction in the future: development seems to have stopped). It's been tagged as such since last November and has not been improved since. -- Luk ^talk 09:03, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:57, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:57, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:26, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. passing small mentions in gnews but nothing else. LibStar (talk) 01:46, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 10:08, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.