Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northern Alliance (Canada)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:40, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Alliance (Canada)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication that this organization is notable. I had intended to clean up the largely unreferenced article based on reliable third-party sources but had to conclude that those sources simply do not cover the organization in any detail, causing severe verifiability issues with possible BLP concerns (especially since this article apparently was used to target specific individuals without reliable sources backing up the allegations). The best sources are two pieces of local news, neither of which provide much information on the group itself. Note that this book took its content from us and is not an independent source. Huon (talk) 12:46, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Mike V • Talk 17:18, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:26, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:26, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:26, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom - not sure there's a reasonable redirect target, Category:Canadian far-right political movements doesn't have a main article or list - David Gerard (talk) 10:44, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TNT; the article does not make much sense. Local coverage is insufficient to support an article on what appears to be a minor incident. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:43, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. No significant coverage in reliable sources to assert notability for organizations. Katnimara (talk) 06:32, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.