Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Sea Boats

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:48, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

North Sea Boats

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 17:25, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to lack of notability established in accordance with topical guidelines for organizations and general notability guidelines, which require significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Best regards, Cindy(talk to me) 16:45, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete as a simple product advert, something Wikipedia is not. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 17:05, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to Neutral now it is a stub. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 09:41, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: promo SPAm, no enc. info.-- Dewritech (talk) 08:19, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but move to PT. Lundin Industry Invest (website here). This company, PT Lundin, appears to be a significant player in the medium-size boatbuilding industry in Indonesia, and there are references available on the web. See this ship. I have to think that any company capable of building a missile-carrying ship of this size (63 m) must be a significant company. A Google search for "PT Lundin" reveals quite a few links. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 17:39, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you can enhance the article to make it worth keeping, please do so. The web site shows simply a company that makes plastic boats. "Quite a few links" do not of the,selves make a notable nor a verifiable article. Reliable sources and genuine notability do. The current article is a simple advert. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 23:41, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I stubbed the article and added a few possible starter references. -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 09:23, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:28, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Assuming that this X3K trimaran isn't some sort of elaborate hoax (it seems to be legit, but really, ), as a manufacturer of military vessels this is a notable company. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:30, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.