Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Kapunda Hotel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – Joe (talk) 11:12, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

North Kapunda Hotel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be notable, no reliable sources. Most of the article is about the pub being haunted. Metaloaf (talk) 01:24, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 01:29, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 01:30, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 01:30, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: if it as old as claimed it would have heritage significance, disregarding all the guff currently in it.--Grahame (talk) 01:46, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:15, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:15, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Even a speedy keep I think. Was any WP:BEFORE done? Immediate search results show current hits from independent reliable sources such as Heritage Australia, The Daily Telegraph, SBS, any others. TROVE gives a few thousand historical hits, both about the facility and the use of and activity in the pub in the daily lives of people and organisations over many years. Very solid WP:NEXIST supporting clear WP:GNG. Aoziwe (talk) 13:00, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, or indeed yes "speedy keep" per User:Aoziwe. Even just this one Heritage Australia page about Kapunda provides enough to make its notability clear. The page includes a photo, gives an alternate/current name ( Sir Sidney Kidman Hotel) for the hotel which would also provide hits, and establishes it was the main hotel in Australia's first mining town. I expect it is specifically a listed building in Australia's heritage register and in South Australia's heritage register. --Doncram (talk) 23:02, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.