Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Normal ECG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Electrocardiography. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:00, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- Did you mean Redirect to Electrocardiography?
  - Yes. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:16, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Normal ECG

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Should be merged into Electrocardiography Rathfelder (talk) 10:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:37, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

merge, exactly. Jytdog (talk) 03:46, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't look like there is much to merge, so I think a redirect will do. --HyperGaruda (talk) 04:33, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 00:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:08, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Electrocardiography as ecg already does. As HyperGaruda observes, within this two-sentence article there isn’t particularly anything of any value to merge- even the image used on this page is from a signal generator (and there is nothing "normal" about that). I can see there are currently seven separate articles on the different waveforms that appear on ecgs. Interpretation of the ecg to exclude any abnormalities isn't straightforward by any means, but I suppose redirects are cheap. Drchriswilliams (talk) 19:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.