Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nollywood Reinvented

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) czar ♔ 22:19, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nollywood Reinvented

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a website that fails to meet WP:WEB. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 03:28, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I think the article is notable enough to be included on Wikipedia. The tone of the article just needs to be corrected. That's all.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 14:09, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Notability refers to the subject, not the article. Can you say specifically which criteria of WP:WEB you feel this meets? §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:02, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:11, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I feel the subject meets the first criteria of WP:WEB. Nollywood reinvented is a well known critic for Nollywood movies and has been featured on quite a number of articles on the media. Examples are: Myne Whitman Writes and Romance Meets Life — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamie Tubers (talk • contribs) 21:09, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buff bills 7701 16:00, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.