Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noctura
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:06, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Noctura (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Band does not appear to satisfy notability guidelines. Assertions of notability fall short of the national levels required by WP:BAND criteria and are strictly at a local level. No referencing to reliable sources. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 21:25, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Charts are not good charts. Coverage is not reliable. More coverage not found. duffbeerforme (talk) 01:51, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not seeing sufficient notability in Google searches, where you'd expect to find tons about notable up-and-coming bands. Not seeing reviews, either. --NellieBly (talk) 03:15, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.