Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Time to Die (song)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy/WP:SNOW keep. The rationale proffered for deletion no longer holds, as the song has now been released and received substantial coverage, and the title has been confirmed. BD2412 T 05:08, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No Time to Die (song)

No Time to Die (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been created prematurely. While a title song for the film No Time to Die exists, the name of the track is unknown. Sources only refer to a "title track", which can simply mean the song that plays over the title sequence. The article itself is largely devoid of content save for quotes by the artists, film's director and producers exprrssing enthusiasm for the song, which you can find for every James Bond title thene. Mclarenfan17 (talk) 19:23, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • WP:TOP4 [A]rguments which base notability or lack thereof upon winning, wins, success or popularity make no use of policies or guidelines.
  • WP:OTHERSTUFF While comparing with other articles is not, in general, a convincing argument, comparing with articles that have been through some kind of quality review such as Featured article, Good article, or have achieved a WikiProject A class rating, make a much more credible case.
I'm not of the opinion that it must be non-notable without a fixed title, so am !voting keep. ☆ Bri (talk) 19:38, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:36, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 19:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 19:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: The movie's coming out in April; it would be silly to delete the article in February only to recreate it two months later. This may be TOOSOON, but not by that much. If there's no independent coverage by the summer, then we could look at it again. -- Toughpigs (talk) 20:43, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to No Time to Die: I actually agree with the nominator that this is WP:TOOSOON. I understand the keep voters and this article will inevitably be recreated in a few months, but WP:TOOSOON should be applied to all articles equally. I do not think the current coverage is strong enough for a standalone article since the information could be contained in the music subsection in the No Time to Die article. I think a redirect would be helpful because it keeps the article's history so it can be recreated in the future. I would not be opposed to a draftify though either. Apologies for breaking the consensus forming above. Aoba47 (talk) 21:37, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Aoba47 and Sergecross73: Just curious if you care to revisit given the release date has been confirmed. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:18, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not really. The release date is still 2 months out, and my main concern was more about the lack of content to warrant a split. Sergecross73 msg me 16:21, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sergecross73, Huh? Feb. 13 is the release date. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:30, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, sorry, I mistook it for the films release date. Sergecross73 msg me 16:52, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the update. I would still wait until the song is actually released and the subsequent media coverage is published before I change my stance. On a different topic, I would be consistent with the formatting for dates (either Month/Day/Year or Day/Month/Year). I am not sure which would be the best since Eilish is an American artist but Bond is a distinctly British property. Aoba47 (talk) 19:58, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Aoba47, Sounds good. Just FYI, the song's been released, so I'm sure more coverage (even with critical reception) will be published as soon as tomorrow. ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:37, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.