Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Entry Mein Entry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 09:28, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No Entry Mein Entry

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film that keeps on getting reverted back-it falls under way too soon and has no notability to be found. (Personally I like to know how a film has a run time when it isn't coming out for at least another year) Wgolf (talk) 00:47, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete According to this article in India Business Times, this film has been shelved indefinitely. That is why we should not have articles about future films unless reliable sources report that principal photography has begun. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:41, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:04, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:04, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Vapor project that never satisfied WP:NFF. And to Wgolf's point about the runtime, yes, and how do we know who the cast is and what their roles are? In this edit the IP adds Prem Khan to the cast. This was a guy who was spamming himself across the project a few months back. Article was previously redirected to No Entry#Sequel which might be a valid alternative to deletion provided the IP doesn't restore it again. However I lean toward deleting as it is unlikely to become anything. I think he's brought other articles out of redirects recently. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:11, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't see evidence that it started filming. The above source that it was shelved means that we're going to need some kind of reliable sourcing for this. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:35, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete- A project that never satisfied WP:NFF- "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles, as budget issues, scripting issues and casting issues can interfere with a project well ahead of its intended filming date." As an interesting question, how did the editors of the article managed to gather the info about the starcast and even the running duration?Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 14:06, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: WP:CRYSTAL. Even the cast of film has not been finalised yet. Redirecting it to parent article is an option but we would need to semi-protect the title. Anup [Talk] 22:18, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.