Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nizamani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. After being re-listed twice there is no consensus to delete the article (non-admin closure) Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 05:39, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nizamani

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced affair that seems to be based on WP:OR and is severely POV. Application of WP:TNT seems the best option. The Banner talk 22:26, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 00:13, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 05:40, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Despite the article's problems, this is notable, per [1] and [2]. I couldn't find any other significant online coverage, but this is notable to history. SL93 (talk) 00:39, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.