Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nitish Rajput

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Essentially, the arguments to delete are stronger, while several to keep are "weak". Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:15, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nitish Rajput

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In principle, subscription counts (is a primary source) do not make one notable. Nor does wealth, revenue, and other size metrics. Fails WP:ENT, WP:GNG, Does not have sufficient coverage WP:SIGCOV in the reliable sources WP:RSP. Charlie (talk) 06:34, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment and India. Charlie (talk) 06:34, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Internet, and Uttar Pradesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:59, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete or draftify and wait for a few more sources. I'm hesitant to delete, since this person clearly has large influence, but the sources here are currently pretty shoddy. Perhaps he'll be WP:N soon? Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 04:00, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable right now Worldiswide (talk) 06:27, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Rajput is a notable YouTuber and influencer who have millions of followers and mentioned on many reliable websites. I think he passes WP:GNG. Rajeev Gaur123 (talk) 04:17, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Subscriber numbers do not establish notability. But a source analysis here would help.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:58, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - When subject is not meets WP:N and they have not enough WP:SIGCOV;so it can be deleted.~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 10:01, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This YouTuber has created several controversial videos with a number of views supported by credible sources, indicating that he meets Wikipedia's notability requirements. 171.76.241.85 (talk) 08:06, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: The subject is covered by Times of India [1], News18 India [2], and Dainik Jagran [3] and these may be in-depth discussions about the subject. -- Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) 17:44, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Having videos that get a lot of views is not an indicator that Wikipedia recognizes as establishing notability.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:40, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Only three pages in Gnews that come up, all appear to be that particular brand of Indian press coverage using the flowery language we see. I don't see notability. One he talks about various websites, others are the "meet the influencer" articles. Oaktree b (talk) 05:50, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This [4] and this [5] are typical Oaktree b (talk) 05:51, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Week Keep Although some of the sources are reliable, however, YouTube views and subscribers doesn't make someone notable for Wikipedia. Atighot (talk) 16:27, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify WP:NEWSORGINDIA Economic Times seems to be mainly notable mention. Others are suspect Comintell (talk) 05:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Few citations i found in this article may pass SIGCOV. And Subject is notable for his controversial videos. WrestlersIndia (talk) 14:22, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.