Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nithya Mammen Singer

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'm going to also salt this. Missvain (talk) 23:01, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nithya Mammen Singer

Nithya Mammen Singer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. resources provided are not reliable and independent of the subject. fails WP:GNG, WP:NSINGER Randfiskin (talk) 11:34, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Randfiskin (talk) 11:34, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Randfiskin (talk) 11:34, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Randfiskin (talk) 11:34, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:57, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:44, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:44, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
See comments below. It turns out that I voted to delete the previous article for this singer, and (unsurprisingly) this version suffers from the exact same problems. Recreating such an article with a different title is a common tactic for someone who is unaware of a previous deletion or refuses to accept it. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 12:51, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • That earlier deletion discussion doesn't seem to have involved any detailed discussion at all and it has been six months since it happened (also I don't think people who are "unaware of previous deletions" have tactics). User:Furius 08:42, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep per WP:BASIC - I am not aware of what the previous article(s) looked like, but I revised this one, and added sources, and there appears to be some significant coverage of her, as well as reviews of some of her work, and news about additional work since the previous deletion. Did the previous article include her actual place of birth and career as an architect? My work on this article has been slow because I am reliant on Google Translate, but it appears that non-English coverage also exists. Beccaynr (talk) 15:44, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and salt a non-notable musician who failed to satisfy WP:MUSICBIO. GSS💬 02:43, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, since they meet neither WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. And due to its history, salt. Onel5969 TT me 03:39, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Onel5969 and GSS: Doesn't she meet condition 10 of WP:MUSICBIO - "Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film"? (I see that there is a proviso that just one example would "probably" lead to a redirect, but she's done multiple films) Furius (talk) 20:59, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.